Aljunied Town Council sued by NEA

 

[Askmelah Note:

1. The manpower cost, time and legal fee involved will be way way more than the $1,000. Is our overly paid civil servants too free or what?

2. If this case happens to PAP-ruling council, will the NEA officers would have just “closed one eye”? Askmelah am sure that this won’t be the first or the last offenses by any town council, ruling PAP TC or otherwise, but why picked on Aljunied TC?

3. If the town council’s mandate has been to take care of maintenance and upkeeping of the public amenities in an HDB estate, why can’t they have the power to lease out a small public place under their charge is indeed troubling to comprehend?

4.  The fair, which featured five stalls selling festive decorations, cookies and sweets, fruits such as pomelo, flowers and assorted potted plants, amounted to a ‘temporary fair’. Mr Tai Ji Choong, who is NEA’s director of the Environmental Health Department, said the town council event constituted a breach of Section 35 of the EPHA. The requirement for a permit for these temporary events is such that “there would not be disamenities (which include noise nuisance, pest infestation, food hygiene issues and disruption to pedestrian flow) caused to the community, including shopkeepers operating in that community”. Err, the reason for needing a license for an auspicious fair is to prevent causing nuisance to public? Askmelah thought this event is a family oriented happy event, No?

include noise nuisance, pest infestation, food hygiene issues and disruption to pedestrian flow. – See more at: http://www.straitstimes.com/news/singapore/more-singapore-stories/story/court-hearing-starts-against-workers-party-town-council-#sthash.rQ14onMi.dpuf
Mr Tai Ji Choong, who is NEA’s director of the Environmental Health Department, said the town council event constituted a breach of Section 35 of the EPHA. The requirement for a permit for these temporary events is such that “there would not be disamenities caused to the community, including shopkeepers operating in that community”, he added. – See more at: http://www.straitstimes.com/news/singapore/more-singapore-stories/story/court-hearing-starts-against-workers-party-town-council-#sthash.rQ14onMi.dpuf
the fair, which featured five stalls selling festive decorations, cookies and sweets, fruits such as pomelo, flowers and assorted potted plants, amounted to a ‘temporary fair’. – See more at: http://www.straitstimes.com/news/singapore/more-singapore-stories/story/court-hearing-starts-against-workers-party-town-council-#sthash.rQ14onMi.dpuf
the fair, which featured five stalls selling festive decorations, cookies and sweets, fruits such as pomelo, flowers and assorted potted plants, amounted to a ‘temporary fair’. – See more at: http://www.straitstimes.com/news/singapore/more-singapore-stories/story/court-hearing-starts-against-workers-party-town-council-#sthash.rQ14onMi.dpuf
the fair, which featured five stalls selling festive decorations, cookies and sweets, fruits such as pomelo, flowers and assorted potted plants, amounted to a ‘temporary fair’. – See more at: http://www.straitstimes.com/news/singapore/more-singapore-stories/story/court-hearing-starts-against-workers-party-town-council-#sthash.rQ14onMi.dpuf
the fair, which featured five stalls selling festive decorations, cookies and sweets, fruits such as pomelo, flowers and assorted potted plants, amounted to a ‘temporary fair’. – See more at: http://www.straitstimes.com/news/singapore/more-singapore-stories/story/court-hearing-starts-against-workers-party-town-council-#sthash.rQ14onMi.dpuf
the fair, which featured five stalls selling festive decorations, cookies and sweets, fruits such as pomelo, flowers and assorted potted plants, amounted to a ‘temporary fair’. – See more at: http://www.straitstimes.com/news/singapore/more-singapore-stories/story/court-hearing-starts-against-workers-party-town-council-#sthash.rQ14onMi.dpuf

5. The TC did write in a few times but was rejected a few times showed that the civil servants are being difficult with opposition TC. The TC’s chairman must be so frustrated with the red tape that she decided to proceed to host the event without a permit, it shows guts as compared to the follow-the-law civil servants and PAPpies.

Askmelah’s conclusion if this is not dirty politics and politically motivated, I really dun know what is.]

 

CNY fair did not need permit: Town council

Source; todayonline October 15, 2014

SINGAPORE — The Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) did not need a permit to organise a Chinese New Year fair in January, its defence lawyer argued yesterday.

Mr Peter Low was speaking on the first day of a trial in which the town council is fighting a summons for holding an alleged illegal trade fair at the Hougang Central Hub.

The town council is charged with committing the offence under Section 35 of the Environmental Public Health Act (EPHA).

It is alleged to have organised the fair without a permit issued by the National Environment Agency.

NEA prosecutors said the fair, comprising five stalls selling items such as festive cookies, fruits and potted plants, amounted to a “temporary fair” — thus requiring a licence under the EPHA regulations.

However, Mr Low argued that under the Town Councils Act sub-section 2(1)(b)(iii), the fair, which used common property, fell under social or communal functions, such as holding mini-fairs, which did not require a permit.

NEA prosecutor Issac Tan countered that the sub-section cited by Mr Low deals with fees imposed for using common property and was not related to licensing issues.

The district court heard that last December, the town council was told by the NEA that a permit was required to hold the fair.

The town council subsequently submitted several documents for its permit application. On Jan 9 — the day the fair started — the NEA informed AHPETC that its application for a permit was incomplete and could not be processed.

The next day, the NEA wrote to the town council, warning it to stop the fair until a permit was issued or enforcement action would be taken.

However, the town council did not reply and went ahead with the fair, the court heard.

If found guilty, AHPETC — which is represented in court by its chairman Sylvia Lim — could be fined up to S$1,000.

Posted in Dirty Politics

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

     

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Google Search

Loading

Categories

My favourite quote today

"I am afraid the cruise ship is over capacity limit, and it used to be a luxury cruise ship. The designer’s claim that it is not sinkable, the name is Titanic. There are not enough life boats, no preparation or provision for failure. Thank you Mr Goh for reminding us." - Low Thia Khiang

"Till today, I am still puzzled by why the PAP cannot fight a fair election without gerrymandering, abusing the GRC system, basically, making sure they enter into a boxing ring with an opponent who is expected to fight them with hands tied behind the back. There is a reason why bullies are not popular in schools. Why not be the school prefect?" - Alvinology

"The question to ask is what lies at the root of the discontent or the disengagement between the G and the people. I am going to stick my neck out and say that it is ministerial salaries. I consider it the root of all evil. Serious. It reduces what should be a social compact into a business contract. " - Bertha Henson